INP

Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology
Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 2
17489 Greifswald
GERMANY

https://www.inp-greifswald.de/en/
welcomeatinp-greifswald [punkt] de

The Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP) is the largest non-university institute in the field of low temperature plasmas, their basics and technical applications in Europe. The institute carries out research and development from idea to prototype. The topics focus on the needs of the market. At present, plasmas for materials and energy as well as for environment and health are the focus of interest.

Cite Dataset

Comparative study of the reactive species in the effluent of two different plasma jet devices operated with air as working gas - dataset

In this work, the reactive species generated by two different plasma jet devices operated with ambient air as working gas are studied experimentally and theoretically. One jet device is based in a non-thermal arc, while the other consists of a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) with two axial electrodes and a double dielectric barrier. Basic electrical characterization was done via voltage and current measurement for both devices with electrical probes and an oscilloscope. The reactive oxygen and nitrogen species present in the jet effluents were measured by Fourier transform infrared absorption spectroscopy (FT-IR). A very different composition of reactive species was found for the two devices. The arc plasma jet has a chemistry dominated by nitrogen reactive species, while the DBD produces mainly ozone. The gas temperature in the discharge region of the two jets was determined by fitting the emission spectrum of the second positive N2 system. The chemical composition in the discharge region was also studied with a theoretical model that considers multiple chemical reactions, taking into account the gas temperature dependence of the reaction rates. It was observed that most of the species identified by FT-IR are predicted by the theoretical model as the most abundant in the discharge region. This result indicates that the chemical composition of the jet effluents can be controlled by only altering the design of the device, as the presence or absence of an insulator between the electrodes modifies significantly the gas temperature in the discharge region.

FieldValue
Group
Authors
Release Date
2026-05-27
Identifier
59921e64-0a98-41d9-a556-1e4fb115bfbf
Permanent Identifier (DOI)
Permanent Identifier (URI)
Is supplementing
Plasma Source Name
Plasma Source Application
Plasma Source Specification
Plasma Source Properties

Power supply: shunted ignition transformer, 10kV amplitude, current limit of 30 mA
Voltage frequency: 50 Hz

Plasma Source 1 (arc plasma jet): A point to plane electrode configuration, generating an arc discharge
Plasma Source 2 (DBD plasma jet): An extended DBD arrangement with gas flushing through like with a plasma jet, yet no visible effluent generated

Plasma Source Procedure

Both plasma sources were operated at open air, no target used.

Plasma Medium Name
Plasma Medium Properties

Gas: Air at atmospheric pressure

For Modeling: The gas used in both plasma sources was humid air with a composition of 78% of nitrogen, 21% of oxygen and 1% of water vapor. The water vapor percentage equals to around 30% relative humidity

Temperature within the discharge:
Plasma Source 1 (arc plasma jet): 1900 K rotational, 8500 K vibrational temperature
Plasma Source 2 (DBD plasma jet): 300 K rotational, 3500 K vibrational temperature

Plasma Medium Procedure

Air was supplied via flow controllers.

Plasma Source 1 (arc plasma jet): 3.5 slm Air
Plasma Source 2 (DBD plasma jet): 1 slm Air

Plasma Diagnostics Name
Plasma Diagnostics Properties

Electrical measurements (voltage and current):
The voltage drop between the electrodes was measured with a high voltage probe (Tektronix P6015A, 1000×) connected to a digital oscilloscope (Picoscope 5244B 200 MHz) set at 15 MS s−1 (megasamples per second) and the current was assessed from the voltage drop over a series resistor (100 Ω) towards ground, by connecting the resistor to the 1 MΩ oscilloscope input via an RG58 cable.

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy:
FTIR measurements were used to determine absolute values of, e.g. O3, NO, NO2, N2O, N2O5, HNO2, HNO3 and H2O2 – if above detection threshold. The IR absorption spectra were measured between 700 and 4000 cm−1 with the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The measuring setup consists of a 15 l multipass cell with 32 m absorption length attached to a Bruker Vertex 80 v FT-IR spectrometer. In order to perform this measurement, the plasma device was placed in a 0.5 l chamber at atmospheric pressure connected by a needle valve to the multipass cell. The latter was held at 75 mbar to slow down the reactions. The chamber has also an exhaust pipe for the excess gas. The wavenumber range of the measurements (700–4000 cm−1) ensures the detection of O3, NO, NO2, N2O, N2O5, HNO2, HNO3 and H2O2.
From the absorbance spectra, absolute species densities were calculated with a curve fitting approach used before. It is based on reference absorbance functions obtained from a spectrum from the PNNL quantitative infrared database for HNO2, and calculated from spectral line information collected in the HITRAN database for all other species of interest. In these reference functions calculated from the absorption cross section σi of the species i, the absorption length L and an imitated instrument function, the species densities ni were fitted to the measured absorbance A(ν) using Beer’s law.
The measured absorbance is calculated from the signal intensity measured with the sample I(ν), and the background intensity I0(ν), which is measured in the same configuration, but without plasma and hence without reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.
In absorbance spectra measured using FTIR spectroscopy, baseline anomalies cannot always be ruled out. Therefore, a linear baseline correction was performed in the transmittance domain. This process was also used to assess to estimate a confidence interval for the calculated concentration values. By deliberately shifting the baseline up and down in the transmittance domain within the noise level of the baseline, a concentration range was determined rather than a single value.

Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) side-on and end-on:
The emission spectra of the plasma jet devices were measured between 250 and 900 nm with a spectrometer (1236 OMA, Princeton Applied Research) equipped with a CCD detector and an entrance slit of 100 μm. The plasma plume of the first device was measured both end-on and side-on in order to distinguish the emission produced in the discharge region from the light emitted only by the plasma plume. The second device was only measured end-on, because it does not feature a protruding plasma effluent.

Reaction kinetic modelling:
The main idea is that the species kinetics is initiated and maintained by the energetic plasma electrons, whose action can be quantified from the measured electric current and voltage supplied to the discharge. To model this process we consider a generic reaction that generates molecules of species q by electron impact on molecules of species m with reaction rate k_{qm}: dn_q/dt = k_{qm} * n_e * n_m expressed in terms of the number densities of electrons and species q and m, and which can be conveniently expressed in terms of the electric current i_p in the plasma.
For the given conditions of the gas inside the discharge region: composition, pressure, and temperature, the G-values for all reactions due to electron impact are evaluated as functions of the electric field using the Bolsig+ code [25]. In the case of the arc plasma jet the integration is between both electrodes, considering the spatially differentiated regions of cathode layer and main channel, which are modeled as described in [16]. For the DBD plasma jet the integration in (2) is done along the streamer channel and in the region around the streamer head.
The gas used in both discharges was humid air with a composition of 78% of nitrogen, 21% of oxygen and 1% of water vapor. The water vapor percentage equals to around 30% relative humidity, corresponding well with feed air humidity measurements. The reactions considered in this medium due solely to electron impact are:
e+N_2 →e+N*_2, e+O_2 →e+O∗_2 , e+N_2 →e+N+N, e+O_2 →O^− +O, e+O_2 →e+O+O,, e+O_2 →e+e+O+O^+, e+H_2 O→OH+H^−, e+H_2 O→e+H+OH, e+H_2O→H_2 +O^−, e+N_2 →e+e+N^+_2 ,e+O_2 →e+e+O^+_2 , e+O_2 →e+O^−_2.
The reactive species accounted for in the model were: O, O-, O*, O2*, O2+, O2-, O3, N, N2*,N2+, NO, NO2, NO3, N2O, N2O3, N2O4, N2O5, H, HO2, OH, H2O+, H2O2, HNO, HNO2, HNO3 and a large number of possible reactions among all present species were also considered.

Language
English
License
Public Access Level
Public
Contact Name
Gerling, Torsten
Contact Email

Data and Resources